For example, one government might perceive stealing as a crime, whereas another might perceive stealing as normality. When we think of this in terms of technology it is crazy. This is because an individual suffering to breathe or live while going through cancer might want to end their life, but on the other hand the doctor cannot agree to end the person's life. To assist in these situations and get through the toughness of each occurrence, one should use the four A's as depicted by Budinger and Budinger. The four A's are acquire facts, alternatives, assessment, and action. Acquiring the facts is to gain all available knowledge so one can make a decision knowing all sides of the situation. Alternatives is listing other options for how one should make a decision. Assessment is figuring out what situation might arise due to the choice and have a back-up plan in check. Action is the last A, and that is going through with the choice and providing a backing statement in case someone doesn't like the original decision. Lastly, do you think it is possible to treat everyone equally without favoritism or bias? I personally do not think this is possible because their is always a voice in one's head that will create an argument or disagreement.
(Decision Making by Stefan Andrej Shambora. Shared under CC BY-NC. Web Source: Flickr)
Biblography:
Budinger & Budinger. Ethical principles, reasoning, and decision making. Web Source:
Article Link
I appreciate the way you structured your notes from the reading! I think you posed a very interesting question at the end. I feel like favoritism and bias are hard things to measure, to begin with. Second, many people do not even realize that they or those around them are exhibiting those thoughts and actions. However, I definitely think that it is important to strive to treat everyone the same, though realistically it might not be possible to completely eliminate all bias.
ReplyDelete